Hello Poets and friends, today I am back from my last vacation from working as an employee. I am now in transition to a new life which might leave more time for writing, but I also hope to set up a small business as an independent contractor, hike more, brew bake, and finally do some overdue house maintenance.
As part of potentially being a consultant, I have started to look at rhetorical devices in language and not surprisingly, I find that a lot of the tools are the same as for poetic devices, which is very useful.
Rhetoric is the art of convincing and we find examples of this art all around us, and of course, language is just a part of this. It also includes body language, voice, clothes, and a lot more.
I think exploring rhetorical devices would be a good thing, not just to express our own causes but also to improve our own abilities to look beyond the “rhetorical tricks” of politicians and salespersons to see the hollowness below a speech.
Many of the devices we have used before like repetitions, metaphor, alliteration, internal rhymes, etc. Others we may have used less such as hyperbole and allusions. In my view the main difference, though between a poetic device and a rhetorical device is how we use it. There has to be a cause that we want to use for convincing.
Many of us remember how Glenn Buttkus used to take a prompt on poetic devices and use it for rhetoric purposes, and many spoken word artists use the same.
I know that many of us are not comfortable in expressing our political opinions so the cause can be anything. Maybe you can imagine yourself trying to sell a used car or convince a teenager to clean up their room.
Imagine yourself giving this as a speech and reading it aloud for yourself. Maybe you may want to use the next live session to perform your speech. You can also try to find an old poem and use rhetorical devices to improve the impact of your message.
You can also listen to speeches that are famous for their rhetorical qualities and try to find how the speaker/writer is doing it.
For instance, here you can find a transcript of Marting Luther King’s “I have a Dream”- speech.
I have collected a few useful links for rhetorical devices, that you may want to refer to for further research of the matter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_device
https://www.thesaurus.com/e/writing/rhetorical-devices/
https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/rhetorical-devices-list-examples
When you have written your poem (any form is allowed including prose poetry) post it to your blog and link your poem below. Then do go around and comment on others. Since this will be a prompt where people may argue for causes that you disagree with please try to focus on how the rhetorical devices has been used rather than what is argued (note to self as well).
And, please remember to have fun.
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
Welcome all;
some of you might already have seen it as it went up briefly already on Wednesday, I will be a bit absent when we open, but i have leftt a bowl of sangria, sodas, coffee, tea and all kind of snacks. Enjoy and I will join you all later.
Carol C said:
Hello dVerse poets, Can’t seem to connect to this page[?] I noticed that an ‘s’ was missing in the link but after correcting that I still cannot connect to the page that Bjorn is hosting. Kind regards, Carol Congalton.
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
It went up one day early due to a mistake of mine… now it should be all accessible in the normal way.
Yvonne Osborne said:
Hey, I couldn’t find the prompt on dVerse! Will this be up today? I’m ready to contribute!
Yvonne Osborne said:
Ah no worries but now I wonder if what I’ve written is appropriate. It isn’t a poem. Prose poem? Maybe…not sure.
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
I am open to many ways to interpret the prompt…
marialberg said:
This will be a fun challenge. I just watched an interesting TED talk about selling ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pY7EjqD3QA ) that was about MAYA: Most Advanced Yet Acceptable design. Derek Thompson was talking about how the human psyche wants the new to be familiar. I’ll be thinking about that as I play with rhetorical devices. Thanks for the sangria! 🍹
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
I think the art of convincing is truly manyfold
msjadeli said:
Hello Bjorn and All. This week has been kicking my butt and way behind on online stuff. Thank you for the links with the myriad rhetorical devices to convince. Let’s see if I can put them to work. A pint of Magners, please?
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
Magners coming up… apple season is upon us after all.
msjadeli said:
Thank you very much. Cheers!
Miriam E. said:
A very interesting prompt, Björn… it was a bit of a challenge for me, but I hope I stepped up to it. Looking forward to what you all will bring to the bar today. Thank you for hosting and thanks for having me. 🙂 Off to see what you all came up with…
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
I loved the way you used the prompt… it is so very open, but I could feel the passion to persuade.
Miriam E. said:
Thank you so much! I feel a bit like I am shouting at people, but it was a fun exercise! 😉
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
Yes… but imagine that you would read your verse at a very slow pace…. I was fascinated listening to Martin Luther King, and how slowly he spoke in his “I have a dream” -speech
Miriam E. said:
… and what an impact it had. Wow.
rog said:
hi Bjorn
hi all
I have cooked to much plum and apple crumble here due to the abundance of fresh plums here. help yourselves.
great challenge with this prompt. it helped me finished the poem I started yesterday.
still have some catch reading to do from Tuesdays prompt, hope to catch up soon
rog
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
This is just to say I do love plums. Yes the rhetorical devices are most powerful
Helen said:
I love a good sangria! Cheers!! I traveled back in time and to a poem I wrote about our special needs son, Carl.
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
Great, yes revisiting and tuning and old poem is great.
Rob Kistner said:
Welcome back Björn, and thank you for hosting. Very interesting prompt. In an effort to be rhetorically convincing, my little demon of darkness grabbed the wheel. Oh well. Glenn might have liked this? 👍🏼✌🏼
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
I think this prompt would have been right up Glenn’s alley… I will get to read your poem soon
Melissa Lemay said:
Thanks for an opportunity to write poetry about socioeconomic issues, among others. This was right up my alley.❤️🙏🏼
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
It can be about anything… but the better you believe in the cause the better.
Frewin55 said:
Yes indeed!
Frewin55 said:
If I had the honour of setting a challenge on dVerse – this would have been it! I am writing an article on the subject of Divorcing the Car which I will post on my blog soon but the ideas for my poem were already churning…
Thanks for the challenge and the snacks Björn!
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
I think as poets we have the tools, but we need to see how we can put the words into use.
Frewin55 said:
It can’t all be moon and June…
grapeling said:
Hi Bjorn. Not writing much anymore so nothing to share, but the prompt caught my eye. I majored in Rhetoric at UC Berkeley in the – well, a long time ago. As Professor Sloane once jokingly said, “Rhetoric – to put it one way, is to put it another.” As academic and practical disciplines, Rhetoric and Philosophy were both crucial in the educations of classical Romans until the fall of the western Roman Empire. The Catholic Church then suppressed the teaching of Rhetoric, while it survived in the Muslim world. It’s posited that the suppression was because the study of Rhetoric is not actually (as you put it), “the art of convincing,” but rather, the art of understanding HOW people convince each other. The Church was the One Truth – so any challenge (or questioning of it) – was suppressed. And learning how to think, how to question – which in my studies was the core element – was in turn suppressed, most effectively, by turning the word ‘rhetoric’ into a pejorative: “it’s only rhetoric”.
But to the point of rhetorical devices – I highly, highly recommend the book by another former prof, the highly esteemed Arthur Quinn, entitled “Figures of Speech”, subtitled, “60 Ways to Turn A Phrase”. It clearly lays out, explains, and gives examples of each, and may be of interest or even value to those who would like to learn more.
Cheers
~m
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
Very interesting, and as you say if rhetoric is the art of convincing it is actually dangerous for those in power especially since I think many use hyperboles so flagrant so they are actually lies.
As for that book, it sounds very interesting…
poetisatinta said:
Great challenge Björn, just about made it before the deadline 😄
Björn Rudberg (brudberg) said:
Good that you made it.